Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:38

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Scientists Stunned as Rare Phenomenon Emerges from Arctic’s Icy Depths - Indian Defence Review
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
The Webb telescope found something exceedingly rare around a dying star - Mashable
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump Crypto Wallet Goes Dark Following Cease and Desist - Decrypt
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What to know about the 2025 U.S. Open, from tee times to TV schedule - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Dolphins place Terron Armstead on reserve-retired list - NBC Sports